Question

 

With respect to language and delivery in a formal conversation, what are the blunders that we need to avoid as speakers? 

21 Jul 2025
Answer :
Word Count : 243
In a formal conversation, effective language and delivery play a crucial role in maintaining professionalism and clarity. One common blunder is the excessive use of filler words such as "um," "like," or "you know." These interrupt the flow of speech and make the speaker appear unprepared or nervous. Another mistake is using overly complex vocabulary or jargon that may confuse _____ __________ _________ ______ ________ _________.
_________ _________ _________ _________ ____.
________ _______ ________ ________ _______ _________ ________ ____ __________ _______ ___ ____.
___ ___ ____ _____ ________ ____ ________ _______.
_________ _________ _________ __________ _______ ___ __________ __________ ___.
___ __________ ____ _____ _________.
______ __________ _____ ________ _______ _____ ______ ______ _________ _____.
__________ __________ _____ _______ ______ ___ ___ _________ ________ ______ _________ ________.
____ ____ _________ ________ ____ ________ ____ ____ ___ ________ __________.
_________ _________ ________ _______ ___ ____.
_________ _______ ____ _____ __________ _____.
___ _______ __________ _________ ____.
________ _________ ______ _________ _______ ____ _______ _____.
__________ ____ __________ _________ _____ _________ ________ __________ _____.
___ ___ __________ _________ _____ ______.
________ _________ ______ ______ _____ ___ ______ _______ ________.
___ ____ __________ ______ _________ ____.
_________ _____ ____ ________ __________.
____ ____ _____ ____ _________.
____ __________ ________ ___ ______ ________ ___ ____ ___.
___ ___ _____ ____ ___ _______ ________ ____.
____ ____ ___ ____ ___ ___.
______ _____ _________ __________ ____ ___.
_________ ___ _____ ___ _________ _________ _____ ________ ________ _______ ____.
Get Full Answer on WhatsApp
Related Questions

 

With respect to language and delivery in a formal conversation, what are the blunders that we need to avoid as speakers? 

Explain how social context influences interpretation with at least two clear examples of informal use of English. 

Pair up with your best friend in your batch or in your locality. Let your friend assume the role of the Senior Manager of an esteemed bank in which you are an employee. You have been recently promoted to a managerial position due to your consistent performance. You are happy yet anxious about the new responsibility. Engage in a formal conversation in English with your friend, who as a Senior Manager is trying to reassure you that you will be doing well in the new role. Prepare a series of formal conversation between your friend and you.

Read the following excerpt on the topic Smoking Kills. These lines are written in Persuasive style. (10) Smoking is injurious to health. It not only kills you but destroys the lives of your loved ones as well. Increase in the number of deaths due to lung cancer which is a result of smoking habit; has taken away so many people away from the ones who love them. It leaves a child fatherless and a partner without a support in this life. Now, attempt to write an argumentative paragraph on the same topic. 

Consider the following domains: 

Nearly nine years ago, on a warm autumn evening in 1945, I was driving over the mountains of Southern Japan to the city of Nagasaki. I thought I was still in open country when all at once I realized that I was already crossing what had been the city. The shadows which flickered past me in the dusk were not rocks and trees: they were crushed buildings; the bare and skewed ribs of factories, and two crumpled gasometers.

The scale of the damage of Nagasaki drained the blood from my heart then, and does so now when I speak of it. For three miles my road lay through a desert which man had made in a second. Now, nine years later, the hydrogen bomb is ready to dwarf this scale, and to turn each mile of destruction into ten miles. And citizens and scientists share at one another and ask: 'How did we blunder into this nightmare?

I put this first as a question of history, because the history of this is known to few people. The fission of uranium was discovered by two German scientists a year before the war. Within a few months, it was reported that Germany had forbidden the export of uranium from the mines of Czechoslovakia which she had just annexed. Scientists on the Continent, in England and America, asked themselves whether the secret weapon on which the Germans were said to be working was an atomic bomb. If the fission of uranium could be used explosively (and this already seemed possible in 1939) it might in theory make an explosion a million times larger than hitherto. The monopoly of such an atomic bomb would give Hitler instant victory, and make him master of Europe and the world. The scientists knew the scale of what they feared very well: they feared first desolation and then slavery. With heavy hearts, they told Albert Einstein what they knew of atomic fission. Einstein had been a pacifist all his life, and he did not easily put his conscience on one side. But it seemed clear to him that no scientist was free to keep this knowledge to himself. He felt that no one could decide whether a nation should or should not use atomic bombs, except the nation itself; the choice must be offered to the nation, and made by those whom the nation has elected to act for it. On August 2, 1939, a month before Hitler invaded Poland, Einstein wrote to President Roosevelt to tell him that he thought an atomic bomb might be made, and he feared that the Germans were trying to make one.

This is how it came about that, later in the war, scientists worked together in England, in Canada and America, to make the atomic bomb. They hated war no less than the layman does- no less than the soldier does; they, too, had wrestled with their consciences; and they had decided that their duty was to let the nation use their skill, just as it uses the skill of the solider or the expert in camouflage. The atomic scientists believed that they

were in a race against Germany whose outcome might decide, the war even in its last weeks. We know now that the race was almost a walk-over. The Germans were indeed trying to make an atomic explosion, and they thought that they were ahead of the allies. But by our standards, what they had done was pitiful; they had not made a pile that worked, and they believed that the fast chain reaction of an atomic bomb was impossible. The Nazis had made fundamental science a poor relation, and put it under second rate party men with splendid titles. And more deeply, the Nazis had sapped the pith and power of research, the quizzical eye and questioning mind, the urge to find the facts for oneself. There were not enough unconventional ideas in the German atomic projects, and when the younger men did put up some, their leaders always knew better.

Answer the following questions based on your reading of the passage

What had drained the blood from the heart of the author?

Describe the circumstances leading to the making of atom bomb.

When was the Hydrogen bomb ready for use?

What, according to the author, was the main reason of the failure of the German  scientists?

 What do you learn from the passage about Albert Einstein?

I want this cleaned immediately

IGNOU Solved Assignments Assignments Ignou Projects Project Previous Year Solved Exam Papers Notes Notes Sample Question Papers Sample Question Papers
Login Cart
IGNOU NEWS
Assignment Submission Last Date Extended Till 30 June 2026 Click Here★★★IGNOU June 2026 TEE Date Sheet Released Click Here★★★
Top
📞
Call Support Instant phone assistance  With respect to language and delivery in a formal conversati
→
🟢
WhatsApp Chat Fast live messaging
→
Email Us Business enquiries & support
→