Question

How is communication disrupted when we choose an inferior medium? Exemplify with an instance from your own life. 

13 Jul 2023
Answer :
Word Count : 355

When we choose an inferior medium for communication, it can lead to various disruptions and difficulties in effectively conveying our message. An inferior medium may lack the necessary features, clarity, or reliability, which can result in misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and even the loss of essential information. Here's an example from my own life:

A few years ago, I was part __________ ____ _______ ___ ________ _________ ______ _________.
______ _______ _________ _____ ________.
__________ _____ ________ ______ _________ _____ _____ ____.
___ _____ _______ _________ __________ _____ __________ ______.
_________ _______ _____ _____ _______ ___ _____ ___ ___.
___ _____ __________ ____ __________ _____.
___ _________ _________ _________ ____ _________ _______ _________ ______ ________.
____ ______ _________ ___ _________ ______.
____ ________ _______ _______ __________ _______ ___.
________ _____ _________ ________ ______ ___ ____ ____.
_____ ____ ____ ______ __________ ________ ____ ________ ______.
________ _______ _______ _____ ____ ___ ______ __________ _____ ____ ____ __________.
______ ______ __________ _______ ___ _______ ___ ______ ________ _________.
_________ ____ ________ _______ _______ ___ ______ ___ ___ ____.
_______ ________ ______ __________ _________ ____ __________ _______ ____ _____.
___ ______ _____ ___ _______ _________ ____ ___.
_________ _______ ____ _____ _____ __________.
________ _____ __________ ________ _______.
______ _________ ___ _____ ________.
_________ _____ _____ ___ _________ _______ ______ ___.
_______ ___ __________ ___ ___ _________ _______.
__________ _________ ______ ______ ___ _________ _______ ____ _____ _______ _________.
___ __________ ___ ________ _______ ___ _________.
_______ ________ _________ _________ ________.
___ ___ _________ ___ _________ ____ ___ ____.
______ ________ ____ _______ ____ _____ ___ _____ _________ _______ ______ ________.
___ ______ _________ ________ ___ __________ _________ _____.
________ __________ _____ _____ _____ ________.
_______ ______ _____ ______ _____.
_____ ________ _______ ____ _____ ___ _____ ________ _______.
______ __________ ____ __________ ____.
__________ ____ _______ _______ _________ ___ _____ ____ __________ _____.
______ _________ ________ ____ ___ ____ __________.
____ ______ _____ _________ _________ __________ ____.
______ ______ ____ ___ __________ ______ _____ ________ _________ ______.
___ _______ ______ __________ _______.
__________ ________ _________ _________ _____ ______ ____ __________ ______ _____.
_______ ________ _______ _____ ____ _________.
Get Full Answer on WhatsApp

Related Questions

What, according to the author, was the main reason of the failure of the German scientists?

What is information overload? How does it affect communication? 

 

With respect to language and delivery in a formal conversation, what are the blunders that we need to avoid as speakers? 

Nearly nine years ago, on a warm autumn evening in 1945, I was driving over the mountains of Southern Japan to the city of Nagasaki. I thought I was still in open country when all at once I realized that I was already crossing what had been the city. The shadows which flickered past me in the dusk were not rocks and trees: they were crushed buildings; the bare and skewed ribs of factories, and two crumpled gasometers.

The scale of the damage of Nagasaki drained the blood from my heart then, and does so now when I speak of it. For three miles my road lay through a desert which man had made in a second. Now, nine years later, the hydrogen bomb is ready to dwarf this scale, and to turn each mile of destruction into ten miles. And citizens and scientists share at one another and ask: 'How did we blunder into this nightmare?

I put this first as a question of history, because the history of this is known to few people. The fission of uranium was discovered by two German scientists a year before the war. Within a few months, it was reported that Germany had forbidden the export of uranium from the mines of Czechoslovakia which she had just annexed. Scientists on the Continent, in England and America, asked themselves whether the secret weapon on which the Germans were said to be working was an atomic bomb. If the fission of uranium could be used explosively (and this already seemed possible in 1939) it might in theory make an explosion a million times larger than hitherto. The monopoly of such an atomic bomb would give Hitler instant victory, and make him master of Europe and the world. The scientists knew the scale of what they feared very well: they feared first desolation and then slavery. With heavy hearts, they told Albert Einstein what they knew of atomic fission. Einstein had been a pacifist all his life, and he did not easily put his conscience on one side. But it seemed clear to him that no scientist was free to keep this knowledge to himself. He felt that no one could decide whether a nation should or should not use atomic bombs, except the nation itself; the choice must be offered to the nation, and made by those whom the nation has elected to act for it. On August 2, 1939, a month before Hitler invaded Poland, Einstein wrote to President Roosevelt to tell him that he thought an atomic bomb might be made, and he feared that the Germans were trying to make one.

This is how it came about that, later in the war, scientists worked together in England, in Canada and America, to make the atomic bomb. They hated war no less than the layman does- no less than the soldier does; they, too, had wrestled with their consciences; and they had decided that their duty was to let the nation use their skill, just as it uses the skill of the solider or the expert in camouflage. The atomic scientists believed that they

were in a race against Germany whose outcome might decide, the war even in its last weeks. We know now that the race was almost a walk-over. The Germans were indeed trying to make an atomic explosion, and they thought that they were ahead of the allies. But by our standards, what they had done was pitiful; they had not made a pile that worked, and they believed that the fast chain reaction of an atomic bomb was impossible. The Nazis had made fundamental science a poor relation, and put it under second rate party men with splendid titles. And more deeply, the Nazis had sapped the pith and power of research, the quizzical eye and questioning mind, the urge to find the facts for oneself. There were not enough unconventional ideas in the German atomic projects, and when the younger men did put up some, their leaders always knew better.

Answer the following questions based on your reading of the passage

What had drained the blood from the heart of the author?

Describe the circumstances leading to the making of atom bomb.

When was the Hydrogen bomb ready for use?

What, according to the author, was the main reason of the failure of the German  scientists?

 What do you learn from the passage about Albert Einstein?

Playground, College canteen, College auditorium, Metro station Lecture hall, Father’s office, Multiplex, Police station, Hospital, Kitchen, Court room, Principal’s office. Classify them into formal and informal categories.

I penalized some of the employees for being always late. 

Consider the following domains:

Playground, College canteen, College auditorium, Metro station Lecture hall, Father's office, Multiplex, Police station, Hospital, Kitchen, Court room, Principal's office.

IGNOU Solved Assignments Assignments Ignou Projects Project Previous Year Solved Exam Papers Notes Notes Sample Question Papers Sample Question Papers
Login Cart
IGNOU NEWS
Assignment Submission Last Date Extended Till 30 June 2026 Click Here★★★IGNOU June 2026 TEE Date Sheet Released Click Here★★★
Top
📞
Call Support Instant phone assistance How is communication disrupted when we choose an inferior medium? Exem
→
🟢
WhatsApp Chat Fast live messaging
→
Email Us Business enquiries & support
→