Question

I want this cleaned immediately

13 Jul 2023
Answer :
Word Count : 388

The statement "I want this cleaned immediately" conveys a strong and urgent demand for something to be cleaned right away. To effectively address such a request, it is essential to consider the context, approach, and appropriate response.

1. Context: Understanding the context of the statement is crucial in responding appropriately. Is the person making the request in a position of authority, such as a supervisor or homeowner? Are there specific reasons why immediate cleaning is necessary, such __________ ___ ___ ________ _________.
________ ________ _______ __________ ________ _________ _____ ______ ___ ________ _____.
____ ____ __________ __________ ______ ____ _____.
_________ ____ _____ __________ _______ _____ ______ ________.
____ _____ ___ ____ ________ _________ ________ _________ __________ ________ ________ ______.
__________ ____ ________ __________ __________ ______ _____ __________ _______ ________.
_____ ______ ________ _________ _________ _____ _______ ___ _____.
_________ ______ ____ ______ __________ _______ ___ ____ _________ _____ _______ ______.
_____ ________ _______ ______ _________ _____ ______ __________ _________ ______ ___ ________.
_______ _______ _____ ________ __________ ________ _______ ______ ___ _____ ____.
______ _____ ________ _________ _______.
___ ___ ______ _____ ___ ___ ____ ___ _________ ____.
__________ ______ ____ _________ __________ _______ ____ ______ _____ ____ _________.
_________ ______ __________ ________ ___ ____ _______.
____ __________ __________ ____ _____ _______ _____ ___.
___ __________ ________ ______ _________ _________ _____ ______.
____ ____ ________ _________ ________ ____ ____ ________ _________.
_____ ________ _____ ______ _________ __________ _______ __________.
____ ________ ________ ____ _____ _________ _________.
____ ________ ___ ____ ___ ________ ______ ____ ____.
________ _______ ___ ________ _________.
___ ______ _____ ______ ________ __________.
____ _______ _________ ___ _____ ____ _______ _________.
_______ __________ ______ ________ _____ ______ ____ __________ __________ _____ __________ ____.
________ ______ ___ _________ ______ ___.
_________ __________ ______ _________ ___ ______ ________ ________ _________ _____ _______ ____.
_____ ___ ________ ______ _______ ___ _________ ______ _________ ______ __________ ____.
_________ __________ _________ _______ _____.
_______ ____ ___ __________ _______ _______ __________ ________ _______ __________ _______ _________.
________ ____ ______ __________ _______ ____ _______ _________ ____.
________ ___ ____ ________ ________ ____ __________ ____ ______ __________ _______ _______.
_____ _________ ______ _____ ________ _______ _______ _____ _______ _______ _______.
_______ _________ ____ __________ _______ ____ ____ _______ _________ ______ ________ __________.
____ __________ ____ _________ ______ __________ _________ __________.
____ ___.
Get Full Answer on WhatsApp

Related Questions

With respect to language and delivery in a formal conversation, what are the blunders that we need to avoid as speakers? 

Nearly nine years ago, on a warm autumn evening in 1945, I was driving over the
mountains of Southern Japan to the city of Nagasaki. I thought I was still in open
country when all at once I realized that I was already crossing what had been the city.
The shadows which flickered past me in the dusk were not rocks and trees: they were
crushed buildings; the bare and skewed ribs of factories, and two crumpled gasometers.
The scale of the damage of Nagasaki drained the blood from my heart then, and does so
now when I speak of it. For three miles my road lay through a desert which man had
made in a second. Now, nine years later, the hydrogen bomb is ready to dwarf this scale,
and to turn each mile of destruction into ten miles. And citizens and scientists share at
one another and ask: ‘How did we blunder into this nightmare?
I put this first as a question of history, because the history of this is known to few
people. The fission of uranium was discovered by two German scientists a year before
the war. Within a few months, it was reported that Germany had forbidden the export of
uranium from the mines of Czechoslovakia which she had just annexed. Scientists on
the Continent, in England and America, asked themselves whether the secret weapon on
which the Germans were said to be working was an atomic bomb. If the fission of
uranium could be used explosively (and this already seemed possible in 1939) it might
in theory make an explosion a million times larger than hitherto. The monopoly of such
an atomic bomb would give Hitler instant victory, and make him master of Europe and
the world. The scientists knew the scale of what they feared very well: they feared first
desolation and then slavery. With heavy hearts, they told Albert Einstein what they
knew of atomic fission. Einstein had been a pacifist all his life, and he did not easily put
his conscience on one side. But it seemed clear to him that no scientist was free to keep
this knowledge to himself. He felt that no one could decide whether a nation should or
should not use atomic bombs, except the nation itself; the choice must be offered to the
nation, and made by those whom the nation has elected to act for it. On August 2, 1939,
a month before Hitler invaded Poland, Einstein wrote to President Roosevelt to tell him
that he thought an atomic bomb might be made, and he feared that the Germans were
trying to make one.
This is how it came about that, later in the war, scientists worked together in England, in
Canada and America, to make the atomic bomb. They hated war no less than the layman
does- no less than the soldier does; they, too, had wrestled with their consciences; and
they had decided that their duty was to let the nation use their skill, just as it uses the
skill of the solider or the expert in camouflage. The atomic scientists believed that they were in a race against Germany whose outcome might decide, the war even in its last weeks. We know now that the race was almost a walk-over. The Germans were indeed trying to make an atomic explosion, and they thought that they were ahead of the allies. But by our standards, what they had done was pitiful; they had not made a pile that worked, and they believed that the fast chain reaction of an atomic bomb was impossible. The Nazis had made fundamental science a poor relation, and put it under second rate party men with splendid titles. And more deeply, the Nazis had sapped the pith and power of research, the quizzical eye and questioning mind, the urge to find the facts for oneself. There were not enough unconventional ideas in the German atomic projects, and when the younger men did put up some, their leaders always knew better.

 

What is information overload? How does it affect communication?

Describe the circumstances leading to the making of atom bomb. 

Explain how linguistic context influences interpretation with at least two clear examples of informal use of English. 

How is communication disrupted when we choose an inferior medium? Exemplify with an instance from your own life. 

I penalized some of the employees for being always late. 

IGNOU Solved Assignments Assignments Ignou Projects Project Previous Year Solved Exam Papers Notes Notes Sample Question Papers Sample Question Papers
Login Cart
IGNOU NEWS
Assignment Submission Last Date Extended Till 30 June 2026 Click Here★★★IGNOU June 2026 TEE Date Sheet Released Click Here★★★
Top
📞
Call Support Instant phone assistance I want this cleaned immediately
→
🟢
WhatsApp Chat Fast live messaging
→
Email Us Business enquiries & support
→