Question

Explain how linguistic context influences interpretation with at least two clear examples of informal use of English. 

13 Jul 2023
Answer :
Word Count : 378

Linguistic context refers to the words and phrases surrounding a particular expression, which helps in determining its meaning and interpretation. The way language is used in a sentence can significantly impact how it is understood. Here are two clear examples of informal use of English and how linguistic context influences their interpretation:

1. Example: "I'm beat."

Linguistic Context: This expression is commonly used _________ ___ ________ ___ _______ _______ ________ _______ __________ ________.
_____ _________ _______ _____ ____ __________ __________ ________ _____.
_______ ___ ______ ________ _________ __________ _____ ____ ______ ___ ______.
_________ ______ ____ ________ ________ ________ ____ _____.
______ ________ _________ _______ ___ ______ _________ ______ ___ ________ _____ _________.
____ ________ _____ __________ ____ _______ ___ _____ ___ ___.
______ _____ ________ __________ ____ ______ ____ ________ __________.
__________ _____ __________ ______ ________ ___ _______ ____ _________ _________ ________ __________.
____ ____ _________ _______ ________ _________ _______ _____ ___.
___ _________ ____ __________ ________ _____.
______ _______ _______ _________ ____.
____ ______ _________ ______ _____ ___.
______ ____ _______ ______ ________ ______ _________ ______ _____.
__________ ___ ____ _____ ____ _____ ________ ____ ________ ____.
____ __________ ______ _____ ____ ____ __________ _________ __________ _________ ___.
____ _______ ____ ________ _____ ________ _____ _________ ____ _______ ___ ______.
_______ _____ ______ _______ ______ ___ ________.
_________ _____ ____ ________ ______ ________.
_______ ________ ____ ________ _________ _________ ____ _______ ______ _________.
______ ____ __________ _____ _____ _______ ___ ___ _________ ___.
______ __________ _________ ___ __________ _________ ________ ___ __________ ____ ___.
____ ______ ________ _______ ______ _______.
_____ __________ ______ ________ ______ ___ ____ _______ ______.
_____ _______ ________ _________ _____ ____ _____ ________.
_____ ________ ______ ______ _____ ____ ______ _______ ___.
_____ ______ ___ ___ ___ _______ _____.
____ _______ _____ ________ _____ ____ ______ _________ __________ ___ ______.
____ ________ __________ _________ ________ _______ ______ ____ _________ __________.
___ ______ _____ _______ _____ __________.
________ ______ __________ _____ ___ __________ ______ _____.
________ ___ ________ _____ ______ ________ _________ _____ ______.
______ ________ ___ _____ _________ ____ __________ _________ __________ _______.
____ ____ ________ _______ _____ ____ _______ ___ _______.
_________ _______ __________ _____ _____ ___ ____ ___ ________.
_________ _________ _____ __________ ________ _____ ________ _______ _________ ___ _________.
Get Full Answer on WhatsApp

Related Questions

 

Explain how social context influences interpretation with at least two clear examples of informal use of English.

 

What is information overload? How does it affect communication?

Playground, College canteen, College auditorium, Metro station Lecture hall, Father’s office, Multiplex, Police station, Hospital, Kitchen, Court room, Principal’s office. Classify them into formal and informal categories.

What, according to the author, was the main reason of the failure of the German scientists?

Nearly nine years ago, on a warm autumn evening in 1945, I was driving over the
mountains of Southern Japan to the city of Nagasaki. I thought I was still in open
country when all at once I realized that I was already crossing what had been the city.
The shadows which flickered past me in the dusk were not rocks and trees: they were
crushed buildings; the bare and skewed ribs of factories, and two crumpled gasometers.
The scale of the damage of Nagasaki drained the blood from my heart then, and does so
now when I speak of it. For three miles my road lay through a desert which man had
made in a second. Now, nine years later, the hydrogen bomb is ready to dwarf this scale,
and to turn each mile of destruction into ten miles. And citizens and scientists share at
one another and ask: ‘How did we blunder into this nightmare?
I put this first as a question of history, because the history of this is known to few
people. The fission of uranium was discovered by two German scientists a year before
the war. Within a few months, it was reported that Germany had forbidden the export of
uranium from the mines of Czechoslovakia which she had just annexed. Scientists on
the Continent, in England and America, asked themselves whether the secret weapon on
which the Germans were said to be working was an atomic bomb. If the fission of
uranium could be used explosively (and this already seemed possible in 1939) it might
in theory make an explosion a million times larger than hitherto. The monopoly of such
an atomic bomb would give Hitler instant victory, and make him master of Europe and
the world. The scientists knew the scale of what they feared very well: they feared first
desolation and then slavery. With heavy hearts, they told Albert Einstein what they
knew of atomic fission. Einstein had been a pacifist all his life, and he did not easily put
his conscience on one side. But it seemed clear to him that no scientist was free to keep
this knowledge to himself. He felt that no one could decide whether a nation should or
should not use atomic bombs, except the nation itself; the choice must be offered to the
nation, and made by those whom the nation has elected to act for it. On August 2, 1939,
a month before Hitler invaded Poland, Einstein wrote to President Roosevelt to tell him
that he thought an atomic bomb might be made, and he feared that the Germans were
trying to make one.
This is how it came about that, later in the war, scientists worked together in England, in
Canada and America, to make the atomic bomb. They hated war no less than the layman
does- no less than the soldier does; they, too, had wrestled with their consciences; and
they had decided that their duty was to let the nation use their skill, just as it uses the
skill of the solider or the expert in camouflage. The atomic scientists believed that they were in a race against Germany whose outcome might decide, the war even in its last weeks. We know now that the race was almost a walk-over. The Germans were indeed trying to make an atomic explosion, and they thought that they were ahead of the allies. But by our standards, what they had done was pitiful; they had not made a pile that worked, and they believed that the fast chain reaction of an atomic bomb was impossible. The Nazis had made fundamental science a poor relation, and put it under second rate party men with splendid titles. And more deeply, the Nazis had sapped the pith and power of research, the quizzical eye and questioning mind, the urge to find the facts for oneself. There were not enough unconventional ideas in the German atomic projects, and when the younger men did put up some, their leaders always knew better.

 

Explain how linguistic context influences interpretation with at least two clear examples of informal use of English.

Describe the circumstances leading to the making of atom bomb. 

IGNOU Solved Assignments Assignments Ignou Projects Project Previous Year Solved Exam Papers Notes Notes Sample Question Papers Sample Question Papers
Login Cart
IGNOU NEWS
Assignment Submission Last Date Extended Till 30 June 2026 Click Here★★★IGNOU June 2026 TEE Date Sheet Released Click Here★★★
Top
📞
Call Support Instant phone assistance Explain how linguistic context influences interpretation with at least
→
🟢
WhatsApp Chat Fast live messaging
→
Email Us Business enquiries & support
→