Apohavada

Dignāga considered the interpretation of conventional and symbolic signs such as the words and sentences of human language to be no more than special or conventional instances of the general principles of inference or anumana.

Dignāga  was __________ _______ ____ _____ __________ _________ _____ ______ ______ _____ ___.
________ _____ _______ _____ ____.
________ ___ __________ _________ __________.
_______ ______ _________ _________ ____.
_________ ____ _______ __________ __________ _______ _____ _________ _______ ____.
_________ ___ __________ ______ ____ _____ ___ _____ ________ _________.
___ ____ _______ __________ ___ ___ __________ _______ _______ _________ ________ __________.
______ _____ ____ _______ ________.
_________ ___ __________ ___ ________ __________ ________ ______ ____.
______ ____ ___ _______ _________ ______ _________ ______ ___ _________ ______ __________.
__________ ____ __________ __________ ______ _______ __________ __________.
____ ______ ______ ________ __________ _____ _________ ___ _____ _______ __________.
___ _________ ________ __________ _______ _______ ____ ________.
_______ _________ ____ ______ _______ ___ _______.
__________ ____ _______ __________ _________ ___ ______ _____ ____.
________ ________ __________ _____ ____.
_________ _____ ______ _________ _________ __________ ____ __________.
_____ __________ ________ ________ _________.
______ ___ __________ _________ ________.
_________ _________ ____ _______ _________ _____ _________ _______ ________ ________ _____ _____.
__________ _______ ____ ______ __________ ___ ____ _____ ____.
________ ____ __________ __________ _____ __________ ______ __________ ________ ____ ________ ________.
_________ __________ __________ ____ ________ ________ ____.
Get Full Answer on WhatsApp